These relief paper-cut drawings are a kind of visual “poetic specimen” that take advantage of analogies such as inside/outside -- land/body -- map/anatomy. Geographic maps of the earth miniaturize their subject, and through that abstraction something very vast can be perceived on a human scale. The Future Studies series takes advantage of this quality of cartography, so that the knowledge/meaning recorded in this map can be contained in within the body of a relatively smaller animal (such as an octopus or nudibranch). I have used the word “future” in the presentation of a low-tech, hand-made paper sculpture as a to confound ideas of knowledge being related to progress – is it true that the future implies more complexity and/or better understanding?